Congresswoman Jackie Speier (D-CA), in an interview with CNN’s Jim Acosta, condemned the Supreme Courtroom’s latest choice to overturn Roe v. Wade and recommended that states banning abortion ought to pressure the “impregnator” to put up a $350,000 “bond” to assist handle the kid.
Speier, who shared her private story of abortion on the Home ground in a 2011 speech, was proven a clip of that second throughout an interview with Acosta on Sunday.
“I notice the posh, frankly, that I had,” to have an abortion on the time she defined, noting that luxurious was “taken away from girls at this time throughout this nation.”
Speier went on to specific settlement with fellow Consultant Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who recommended Supreme Courtroom Justices should be impeached as a result of they “lied underneath oath.”
“There’s no query they lied they usually did that underneath oath. So there ought to be penalties,” she concurred.
That’s when issues turned very, very unusual.
On the #StopTheBans rally, Rep. Jackie Speier says she shouldn’t be ashamed of her second-trimester abortion, that she had for medical causes, and criticized male state lawmakers for pondering “it’s alright to ship girls to jail or give them the demise penalty for having an abortion.” pic.twitter.com/mJLaNBFW8t
— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) May 21, 2019
RELATED: Justice Alito’s Opinion Doesn’t Simply Overturn Roe v. Wade, It Shreds It to Items
Jackie Speier: Power ‘Impregnator’ to Pay a Bond
Help Conservative Voices!
Signal as much as obtain the newest political information, perception, and commentary delivered on to your inbox.
In one of many extra absurd responses to the abortion ruling by the Supreme Courtroom, Consultant Jackie Speier tossed out a suggestion that state legislatures take up payments that may pressure the “impregnator” to put up a $350,000 bond to assist look after the kid.
“For all these states now saying a girl can’t get an abortion, I’d counsel their legislatures require the impregnators to place up a $350,000 bond so a mom can handle that baby,” she instructed Acosta.
Speier seems to, like many in her celebration, wrestle to grasp how intercourse works and that it takes two folks to create life by way of being pregnant. She additionally appears to be a bit ignorant on the state of the economic system and the quantity of people that have $350,000 of their financial institution accounts.
In response to Open Secrets and techniques, Speier has a internet price of over $11 million.
ICYMI: Dem. Rep. Jackie Speier gave us this response to Roe being overturned: “For all these states now saying a girl can’t get an abortion, I’d counsel their legislatures require the impregnators to place up a $350,000 bond so a mom can handle that baby.” pic.twitter.com/Q3rmaUg0A0
— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) June 26, 2022
Speier has made previous arguments through which she focuses on the “impregnator” on the subject of abortion.
She warned in December because the case was being heard within the Supreme Courtroom, “I believe the nation hasn’t seen the craze of ladies talking out.”
She mentioned pro-life legal guidelines are “supposed to be misogynistic” and say nothing concerning the “accountability of the impregnator.”
He ought to be topic to a DNA take a look at &required to put up a $300,000 bond for the kid SCOTUS & reactionary legislatures counsel is nothing greater than immaculate conception. The identical individuals who don’t need masks mandates imposed on their our bodies are able to take management of our uteruses.
— Jackie Speier (@RepSpeier) May 3, 2022
RELATED: Gun Rights Victory: Supreme Courtroom Tosses New York Regulation Limiting Hid Carry
Made the Argument Earlier than
Simply final month, Jackie Speier mentioned the ‘impregnator’ ought to put up a $300,000 bond and cited masks mandates when arguing the federal government shouldn’t have management of ladies’s our bodies.
“He ought to be topic to a DNA take a look at [and] required to put up a $300,000 bond for the kid,” she tweeted, suggesting the Supreme Courtroom believes pregnancies are a results of “immaculate conception.”
“The identical individuals who don’t need masks mandates imposed on their our bodies are able to take management of our uteruses,” she added.
Speier’s response to the abortion case is just like that of Consultant Cori Bush, who likewise wished to concentrate on the ‘impregnator.’
In that case, Bush (D-MO) wished to know why Congress hadn’t been taking on “sperm regulation laws.”
“You realize, there’s a cause why we don’t see sperm regulation laws,” Bush mentioned in an interview with MSNBC’s Pleasure Reid. “There’s a cause why we don’t see mandated vasectomies.”
“You realize, the very concept that we’d take away males’s bodily autonomy is outrageous, like, it’s unfathomable,” she added.
“However honestly sperm are busy. It’s busy. Who’s regulating that? Who’s saying one thing about it? … The place is that laws?”
Speier, in the meantime, has argued that abortion is such a ‘luxurious’ in at this time’s world that it quantities to little multiple having their knowledge tooth extracted.
It is a Congresswoman people!
Rep. Jackie Speier believes abortions are “safer than a knowledge tooth extraction”
Abortion is terminating one other human being!
There are dangers of problems for mom throughout & after abortions
Ladies don’t cry for yrs mourning their knowledge tooth. pic.twitter.com/PG0DzwRPUr— 𝕁𝕖𝕟𝕟𝕚𝕗𝕖𝕣🔱🇺🇸🔱 Religion not concern! (@GodLovesUSA1) March 5, 2020
“Abortions are one of many most secure procedures you may do on an outpatient foundation, safer than doing an endoscopy or doing a knowledge tooth extraction,” mentioned Speier.
After all, that’s not true. It solely applies in the event you’re prepared to utterly overlook the truth that neither an endoscopy nor knowledge tooth extraction entails the demise of a child.
Now’s the time to help and share the sources you belief.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Finest Political Blogs and Web sites.”
